Marriage is a fitting example of a relational contract where we focus on the relationship. Commercial contracts often concentrate on ‘what we will do when things go wrong’. In doing so, we miss out on the wonderful relationship we could have created.
When couples marry, they agree on shared values as well as individual rights and responsibilities. They enter marriage intending personal growth as well as love and support of the other as best they can provide. They work toward relationship health rather than adversarial positions. We do not apply the same contractual rigour, review of performance, or service credits to a marriage (unless we wish to kick start a big argument, that is!). And, instead of ending the contract when the relationship fails, there are remedies available to help rebuild trust.
This is very different to how we contract in business. We seek a supplier to meet a need and our selection uses many factors. These include performance, price, delivery, appearance, and service. We then watch their performance and, if not perfect, they are sacked and replaced. We almost expect things to go wrong from the beginning. We seek remedies that are punitive or even painful to discourage unwanted behaviours.
In reality, we adopt a ‘them and us’ approach that is so common in our society. In Parliament, red lines in the carpet keep the government and the opposition two sword lengths apart. In court, there are prosecutors and defenders and a referee in the middle. Our games are often two opposing sides competing to be the winner.
Business is not so vastly different where companies rely on cost and price-cutting to win the deal instead of physical or debating skills. Sometimes there is more than money at stake.
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in 2010 was the largest environmental disaster in American history. A White House commission blamed BP and its partners for a series of cost-cutting decisions and an inadequate safety system. This led to BP paying around $65 billion in clean-up costs, court fees and penalties (as of 2016, the costs continue to rise).
In contrast, marriage is about developing and growing together in the long term to achieve better outcomes. We each rely on the other’s strengths to make the partnership succeed.
I recently read this article in the Harvard Business Review: A New Approach to Contracts: How to build better long-term strategic partnerships David Frydlinger, Oliver Hart, and Kate Vitasek. It describes how this approach to longer-term relationships pays dividends to all concerned – these can be both financial and service-based.
Here’s what we need to do to create and sustain long-term relationships:
So how can we reach this state of nirvana? My approach is as follows:
In practical terms, you’ll want to think about the following:
As with all life experiences, we want the best of everything. This is what I advocate for your contracts and your supply chain relationships. Using this fresh style of contracting, you will build relationships that seek to achieve successful projects. The shared values and joint objectives free you to focus on what will deliver profit and acclaim to all parties. You will remove the frustration of looking only at the transactions. You want your staff to say that it was a joy to work on a project. When it comes down to it, happy staff are productive staff who will solve issues in a collegiate manner. This is far preferable to working in a ‘them and us’ culture where individuals look for the person to blame.
If you would like to discuss this further or look to introduce it to specific projects, feel free to contact me for a chat at [email protected].
Ready to take your contracts to the next level? Reach out to Best Contracts by Design Limited today and let us help you unlock your business's full potential. Our team of experts is here to assist you every step of the way.